 |
| |
| Pam Grossman,
Professor, Curriculum and Teacher Education, Stanford University. |
|
| Nancy Cloud,
Associate Professor, Feinstein School of Education and Human Services,
Rhode Island College. |
 |
| Julian Edge,
Lecturer, Language Studies Unit, Aston University, United Kingdom. |
 |
| Tony Erben,
Professor, Secondary Education Department, University of South
Florida. |
 |
| Donald Freeman,
Professor & Director, Center for Teacher Education, Training
and Research, School for International Training. |
 |
| Eileen Gilsan,
Professor, Spanish and Foreign Language Education, Indiana University
of Pennsylvania. |
 |
| Karen E. Johnson,
Professor & Director, Linguistics and applied Language Studies,
Pennsylvania State University. |
 |
| Elana Shohamy,
Professor & Chair, Language Education Program, Tel-Aviv University. |
 |
| Ann Snow,
Professor, Charter College of Education, California State University-Los
Angeles. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Building on our Strengths:
Second International Conference on Language Teacher Education
Summary of Presentation:
"The Power of Tests over Teachers; The Power of Teachers over Tests" |
| Elana Shohamy, Tel-Aviv University
· May 18, 2001 |
The act of language testing is not neutral; although not explicitly stated,
language tests are often used in a 'top/down' manner as tools for defining
language knowledge, implementing policies and gatekeeping unwanted groups
(Shohamy, 2001). As part of this process teachers become the agents through
whom such power and control is being exercised as teachers are the ones
responsible for implementing the testing policies of central agencies with
no power and authority to resist. This phenomenon is especially noticed
in contexts where national and state-wide tests.
The paper will describe the above process, provide empirical data that
will demonstrate its effects and impact on language teaching in the classroom.
It will argue that the top down approach to testing is undemocratic and
unethical as it treats teachers as agents for carrying out orders rather
than as authoritative, professional decision makers. It will propose alternative
assessment models which are driven by teachers, are based on pedagogical
considerations and where tests and other assessment tools serve as devices
for educational purposes in interactive, cooperative, democratic and constructive
ways. It is thus in the power of teachers to turn tests into effective
pedagogical tools that can empower teachers and improve language learning.
Back to Conference Information.
|
 |
|
|
|