 |
| |
| Pam Grossman,
Professor, Curriculum and Teacher Education, Stanford University. |
|
| Nancy Cloud,
Associate Professor, Feinstein School of Education and Human Services,
Rhode Island College. |
 |
| Julian Edge,
Lecturer, Language Studies Unit, Aston University, United Kingdom. |
 |
| Tony Erben,
Professor, Secondary Education Department, University of South
Florida. |
 |
| Donald Freeman,
Professor & Director, Center for Teacher Education, Training
and Research, School for International Training. |
 |
| Eileen Gilsan,
Professor, Spanish and Foreign Language Education, Indiana University
of Pennsylvania. |
 |
| Karen E. Johnson,
Professor & Director, Linguistics and applied Language Studies,
Pennsylvania State University. |
 |
| Elana Shohamy,
Professor & Chair, Language Education Program, Tel-Aviv University. |
 |
| Ann Snow,
Professor, Charter College of Education, California State University-Los
Angeles. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Building on our Strengths:
Second International Conference on Language Teacher Education
Challenges of Diversity in Language Education |
| Eugene Garcia, University of California-Berkeley |
It would seem useful to recognize that we are all walking in varied and
diverse races and cultures. Moreover, diversity within each individual
is as great as diversity between individuals and the many cultures and
races they belong to or represent. We are all living with diversity, some
of us more than others-but teacher escapes this challenge or its advantages
and disadvantages. Historically, previous teachers like Plato and Aristotle
differed vehemently on the value of diversity. Plato concluded that homogeneity
among peoples in a nation state minimized political tensions and favoritism.
Aristotle, his student, concluded that diversity fostered inventiveness
and creativity as well as political compromises in a democracy. Today,
within our borders, English First is passionately concerned that multilingualism
will produce the next significant blood bath within our country while indigenous
people and voluntary and involuntary immigrants mourn just as passionately
the loss of their languages, cultures and racial pride. As this country
and the world shrinks communicatively, economically, and socially our diversity
becomes more visible and harder to hide. But it has been and always will
be there. Our social institutions will need to address it more than in
the past and of specific importance will be how our educational institutions
help us address it successfully. At the core of our educational "treatment"
of diversity are two presuppositions:
- To honor diversity is to honor the social complexity in which we live-to
give the individual integrity and where he/she develops as a human being
a similar integrity.
- To unify is absolutely necessary, but to insist upon it without embracing
diversity is to destroy that which will allow us to unite-individual and
collective dignity.
With this in mind, I will address several "tough issues" that
our teaching colleagues and I are dealing with as we work within an educational
framework aimed at equity and excellence:
- How does one deal with diversity as an instructional resource in a
set of institutions, public and private, which perceive racial, ethnic
and linguistic diversity as a problem-too often focusing on needs assessments
without a concern for asset inventories?
- How do varied social institutions and their agents, particularly in
our public education agencies, deal with the "new diversity?"
That "new diversity," driven by continued waves of immigration
and family mobility, collides in those agencies and either reinforces
or creates racial, linguistic and national origin isolating situations
which serve no student well.
- In a society with high degrees of racial, ethnic and linguistic diversity,
how must we address, in particular, the issues of educational excellence
and equity?
Back to Conference Information.
|
 |
|
|
|