VAC Home powered by Google    
U of M
 

What am I Assessing?

 
 
 

Process 

Matching assessment to your goals

A framework for performance assessment

Cultures, Connections, Comparisons, Communities

Examples  

Reflection  

Resources  

 
 
 
 
 

What am I Assessing?

 
 

Process

 
     
 

A framework for performance assessment

The graphic to the right was created for the Foreign Language National Assessment of Educational Progress (FLNAEP) by a committee of language educators from across the United States. It represents the assessment framework that will be used in the FLNAEP and reflects the interrelatedness of the Five ‘C’s of the National Standards for Foreign Language Learning.

Communication is the focal point of the graphic and should be the focal point of assessments in the foreign language classroom. From the National Standards, we understand that there are three types, or “modes “ of communication, the Interpretive, Interpersonal, and Presentational. These three modes are identified in the graphic as the sides and base of the communication triangle. The visual reminds us that the triangle, hence the assessment of communication, is incomplete without attention to all three modes.

Because the terminology related to the three modes of communication is relatively new, the graphic “defines” the modes through the ring of terms that are familiar to both professionals and the general public. The Interpretive Mode involves one-way communication via reading and listening. The Interpersonal Mode is two-way, interactive communication via conversation (listening/speaking) and e-mail (reading/writing). The Presentational Mode is one-way communication via speaking and writing.

Perhaps the most important message from this graphic is that in today’s foreign language classroom reading, writing, speaking, and listening should not be treated as isolated skills. It is the interconnectedness of these skills that strengthens learning. Assessment then, should also reflect this interconnectedness. By striving to plan an integrated unit, the line between instruction and assessment fades. The ultimate goal is for the line to disappear. In other words, teachers would not stop to assess but integrate assessment into their instruction so that students, while demonstrating what they know and can do, are also learning while they perform the assessment task----assessment is not simply regurgitation of information, it is application of what was learned to an authentic (real life) communicative situation.

 
     
 

Top of page

Next: Cultures, Connections, Comparisons, Communities

 
 
 
University of Minnesota
International Programs
Department Directory
U of M Search
OneStop: Student Info
Campus Maps
Second Languages and Cultures
Comparative and International
     Development Education
CARLA's Mission
CARLA Staff and Faculty
Graduate Assistant Employment Opportunities
National Language Resource Centers
CARLA Funding Sources
Contact Us
Get on Our Mailing List
What's New
Articulation of Language Instruction
Content Based Language Teaching With Technology (CoBaLTT)
Culture and Language Learning
English as a Second Language Learning and Teaching
Language Immersion Education and Research
Less Commonly Taught Languages (LCTL)
Maximizing Study Abroad
Pragmatics / Speech Acts
Second Language Assessment
Second Language Learning Strategies
Technology and Second Language Learning
Summer Institutes for Teachers
Conferences and Workshops
Lunchtime Presentations
CARLA Publications & Working Papers
Bibliography of Publications & Presentations
Less Commonly Taught Languages Databases
Language Proficiency Assessments
Language Proficiency Handbook for Teachers
Virtual Assessment Center
Content-based Instruction Resources
Immersion Education Archives
Resource Links for Language Teachers